Kourtney explains to her sisters how their priorities differ from hers. The moment shows a tearful Kourtney amid one of her many clashes with her sisters, Kim and Khloe. The woman heard in this sound is none other than Kourtney Kardashian from a 2018 episode of "Keeping Up With The Kardashians." The Kardashian women are everywhere – even on TikTok. #kourtneykardashian ♬ original sound - zzzachariah Sounds like a fun character.Calling out of my shift after sitting in the parking lot contemplating quitting for 25 minutes. And I get what you mean alert/lucky are pretty thematic for a chonogurist. That's a pretty good tradeoff, and it only costs you a 1-dip.Ĭorrect, mechanically better than metamagic but far from needed. Proficiency in Con saves instead of Wis.Proficiency in all simple weapons, which is also neither here nor there for most wizards.Proficiency in thieves' tools and tinker's tools and any 1 artisan's tools, which is neither here nor there, in general.Proficiency in light armor, medium armor, and shields, which are excellent for any wizard unless your race already gives them to you.You get these benefits in exchange, assuming Artificer is your first level: you'll need to be level 4 to prepare L2 spells, not level 3) and operate with the same slots. However, if I understand you correctly, your interpretation is that resilient is not necessary but is generally more useful than metamagic or telekinetic.Ĭan you multiclass? A 1-dip into Artificer won't hurt your spell slot progression instead, you lag your access to higher leveled spells by 1 level (e.g. Alertness and lucky actually fit a chronurgist well (manipulation of time and probability). For me though alert&Lucky fall into the same thematic category as res con, they are just numbers boosters that people feel the need to take so if I were to drop 1 feat for res con it would be one of them. Useful isn't the most important thing in the game, you have an idea in mind that calls for metamgaic and the telekinetic feat, I'd roll with that. They are useful and probably more useful than meta magic with 2 metamagic points to play with. You may want to play more defensively than you normally would to reduce the odds you are hit in the first place. You still will have a 60% chance to maintain the spell in most cases when hit, and losing concentration here and there isn't the end of the world. I have played multiple wizards who never got them. Would greatly appreciate others' thoughts as I have had no experience with taking telekinetic or metamagic on a wizard and am a bit gun shy to run without resilient. My DM is okay with my taking the Tasha's feats, but I am also not looking to set a precedent. Some may question whether Tasha's is completely balanced as compared to the PHB and earlier sources. There is also the consideration that no one else in the party is drawing on Tasha's material at this point. However, catastrophic failures are just that: catastrophic. As a wizard, I have found the need for concentration saves to be infrequent. I generally take resilient when playing spellcasters and dislike it as it feels like a tax. There is also the possibility of getting a mind sharpener, though that would only be useful as long as no magical robes became available to me. As a chronurgist, I will have a few ways to redo failed concentration saves each day. the benefits of telekinetic (bonus action uses) and metamagic adept (pesumably subtle spell and transmuted spell). The main difference would be getting proficiency in Con (concentration) saves and additional HP vs. The campaign is expected to run to at least level 15 and possibly level 20. Beginning Int 16, Con 15 Feats taken in order: ASI Int +2, ASI Int +2, Resilient (Con), Alert, Lucky Beginning Int 17, Con 14 Feats taken in order: Telekinetic, ASI Int +2, Metamagic, Alert, LuckyĢ. The options I am considering are as follows:ġ. I am starting a chronurgy wizard in a new campaign (level 5) and am debating which feats to take.
0 kommentar(er)
